| Feature | Cleanvoice AI | Loom |
|---|---|---|
| Free Plan | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Pricing | Free / $10/mo | Free / $15–$20/mo |
| Rating | ★★★★★ 4.5 | ★★★★★ 4.7 |
| Key Feature 1 | Filler word removal | Screen recording |
| Key Feature 2 | Mouth sound removal | AI summary |
| Key Feature 3 | Silence trimming | Transcription |
Reach buyers comparing Cleanvoice AI and Loom. High-intent traffic, direct conversions.
Loom edges out Cleanvoice AI on user ratings (4.7 vs 4.5 out of 5), though both remain solid choices depending on your priorities. Both Cleanvoice AI and Loom offer free plans, so you can test both before committing. Cleanvoice AI tends to be favoured by content-creators and youtube-creators, while Loom is more popular with remote-work and startups.
Cleanvoice AI and Loom are frequently weighed against each other — Cleanvoice AI is built around voice generators while Loom leans toward productivity tools. Cleanvoice AI is best known for filler word removal, whereas Loom stands out for screen recording. On aggregate user ratings Loom holds a slight edge (4.5/5 vs 4.7/5), though that gap rarely decides the match on its own.
Where Cleanvoice AI pulls clearly ahead is removing filler words (um, uh, like) from podcast recordings automatically. A frequent plus in reviews: Removes hours of manual editing. Loom, by contrast, is the stronger choice for recording a quick screen walkthrough instead of writing a long explanation. In its favour: Best async communication tool — especially for screen recording workflows where Loom consistently outperforms manual approaches. The feature checklists overlap, but the day-to-day experience does not.
Cleanvoice's automation is genuinely impressive for repetitive audio cleanup tasks — what takes a skilled editor 2-3 hours per episode takes Cleanvoice minutes. Loom is the best tool for async video communication — the recording-to-shareable-link workflow takes under 30 seconds, and the viewer engagement tracking is uniquely valuable. If you only have budget or appetite for one, match the tool to your heaviest workflow rather than the spec sheet.
Choose Cleanvoice AI if you are focused on podcasters and audio content creators who spend significant time on post-production cleanup — removing 'ums', mouth clicks, and background noise — and want to automate the tedious editing work, or if a big part of your week goes to cleaning up background noise and mouth sounds in one upload. Its free tier also lets you validate the fit before paying.
Choose Loom if your priority is remote teams, designers, developers, and product managers who communicate asynchronously and want to replace long emails and Slack messages with short, contextual video messages, especially for sharing a Loom link for code review, design feedback, or bug reports. A free plan is available, so you can trial the workflow at zero cost first.
In day-to-day use, Cleanvoice AI feels strongest at removing filler words (um, uh, like) from podcast recordings automatically, while Loom is more at home with recording a quick screen walkthrough instead of writing a long explanation.
Learning curve is worth weighing. Cleanvoice AI has a known trade-off — Occasional false positives removing real words. On Loom's side: Storage limits on free — worth evaluating before committing if this is central to your use case. Whichever one slots into your current stack with the least friction tends to win in the long run.
Both tools offer a free plan, so you can trial each side by side before spending anything. Paid plans start at $10/hr of audio for Cleanvoice AI (Pay-per-use) and $15/user/mo for Loom (Business), making Cleanvoice AI the cheaper entry point at $10/hr of audio versus $15/user/mo. The extra spend on Loom only pays off if you need what its higher tier unlocks.
🚀 Ready to decide? Try both free and see which fits your workflow.
Cleanvoice AI is a podcast production tool that automatically removes filler words, background noise, mouth sounds, and dead air from audio … Read the full Cleanvoice AI review →
Loom is a video messaging tool for recording and sharing quick screen recordings and talking-head videos — the fastest way to communicate so… Read the full Loom review →
• Removes hours of manual editing
• 40 language support is exceptional
• Timeline export lets you review before committing
• Strong value at Free / $10/mo — delivers filler word removal at a fraction of the cost of alternatives
• Occasional false positives removing real words
• Less full-featured than Descript — worth evaluating before committing if this is central to your use case
• Best async communication tool — especially for screen recording workflows where Loom consistently outperforms manual approaches
• AI summary is excellent — especially for screen recording workflows where Loom consistently outperforms manual approaches
• Easy to use and intuitive interface — making it simple for team members to create and share videos
• Excellent for remote teams — enabling them to communicate effectively and efficiently
• Storage limits on free — worth evaluating before committing if this is central to your use case
• No live meeting recording — worth evaluating before committing if this is central to your use case