| Feature | Consensus | ThoughtDAG |
|---|---|---|
| Free Plan | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Pricing | Free / $9.99/mo | not yet public |
| Rating | ★★★★☆ 4.4 | ★★★★☆ 4.2 |
| Key Feature 1 | Evidence-based answers | Editable context graph |
| Key Feature 2 | Paper synthesis | Improved LLM conversations |
| Key Feature 3 | Citation export | Innovative approach to |
Reach buyers comparing Consensus and ThoughtDAG. High-intent traffic, direct conversions.
Consensus edges out ThoughtDAG on user ratings (4.4 vs 4.2 out of 5), though both remain solid choices depending on your priorities. Both Consensus and ThoughtDAG offer free plans, so you can test both before committing.
Consensus is an AI search engine for scientific research that finds and synthesises evidence from peer-reviewed papers — answering your ques… Read the full Consensus review →
An editable context graph for LLM conversations Read the full ThoughtDAG review →
• Cites real papers — especially for evidence-based answers workflows where Consensus consistently outperforms manual approaches
• Great for quick evidence checks
• Comprehensive coverage of scientific literature — with over 200 million papers across various fields
• User-friendly interface — making it easy for non-experts to navigate and understand complex research topics
• Narrow to published research — worth evaluating before committing if this is central to your use case
• Some papers paywalled — worth evaluating before committing if this is central to your use case
• Revolutionary approach to LLM conversations
• Potential to improve AI research
• Limited information available