| Feature | Granola | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Free Plan | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Pricing | Free / $18/mo | Free / $9–$29/mo |
| Rating | ★★★★★ 4.8 | ★★★★★ 4.6 |
| Key Feature 1 | Bot-free capture | Visual workflow builder |
| Key Feature 2 | Jottings enhancement | 1,500+ app connectors |
| Key Feature 3 | Any platform | Error handling |
Reach buyers comparing Granola and Make. High-intent traffic, direct conversions.
Granola edges out Make on user ratings (4.8 vs 4.6 out of 5), though both remain solid choices depending on your priorities. Both Granola and Make offer free plans, so you can test both before committing. Granola tends to be favoured by enterprises and researchers, while Make is more popular with agencies and programmers.
Granola versus Make is one of the more common decisions buyers face — both sit in the productivity tools space, but they solve the problem from different angles. Granola is best known for bot-free capture, whereas Make stands out for visual workflow builder. On aggregate user ratings Granola holds a slight edge (4.8/5 vs 4.6/5), though that gap rarely decides the match on its own.
Where Granola pulls clearly ahead is taking personal meeting notes with AI enhancement without an obvious recording bot. A frequent plus in reviews: Invisible to other meeting participants. Make, by contrast, is the stronger choice for building complex multi-branch automation with conditional logic. In its favour: More powerful than Zapier — especially for visual workflow builder workflows where Make consistently outperforms manual approaches. The feature checklists overlap, but the day-to-day experience does not.
Granola's local capture approach is its key differentiator — it works without joining your meeting as a bot, which is important for confidential discussions. Make is the right automation tool for anyone who has hit Zapier's complexity ceiling. Bottom line: the "better" tool here is the one that fits the work you do most.
Choose Granola if you are focused on mac users who want AI-enhanced meeting notes without adding a bot to their calls — particularly those in meetings where adding a recording bot would be awkward or unwelcome, or if a big part of your week goes to getting structured AI summaries from your own meeting notes and audio. Its free tier also lets you validate the fit before paying.
Choose Make if your priority is technical users, developers, and operations teams who need complex automation with branching logic, data transformation, and multi-step processes — and who find Zapier too simple, especially for transforming and mapping data between apps with custom formulas. A free plan is available, so you can trial the workflow at zero cost first.
In day-to-day use, Granola feels strongest at taking personal meeting notes with AI enhancement without an obvious recording bot, while Make is more at home with building complex multi-branch automation with conditional logic.
Learning curve is worth weighing. Granola has a known trade-off — Mac only — no Windows or mobile app. On Make's side: Steeper learning curve — worth evaluating before committing if this is central to your use case. Whichever one slots into your current stack with the least friction tends to win in the long run.
Both tools offer a free plan, so you can trial each side by side before spending anything. Paid plans start at $10/mo for Granola (Pro) and $9/mo for Make (Core), making Make the cheaper entry point at $9/mo versus $10/mo. The extra spend on Granola only pays off if you need what its higher tier unlocks.
🚀 Ready to decide? Try both free and see which fits your workflow.
Granola is a macOS AI notepad that runs in the background during meetings — capturing your personal notes and the meeting audio separately, … Read the full Granola review →
Make (formerly Integromat) is a visual automation platform connecting 1,800+ apps through a drag-and-drop scenario builder. Unlike Zapier's … Read the full Make review →
• Invisible to other meeting participants
• Works with any meeting app without integration
• Jottings + AI hybrid produces great notes
• Very low friction to set up
• Mac only — no Windows or mobile app
• Requires microphone and system audio access
• More powerful than Zapier — especially for visual workflow builder workflows where Make consistently outperforms manual approaches
• Practical free tier that lets you validate the tool before committing to paid plans
• Highly customizable and flexible, allowing users to create complex automations tailored to their specific needs
• Cost-effective for high-volume automations, with a pricing model based on operations rather than tasks
• Steeper learning curve — worth evaluating before committing if this is central to your use case
• UI can be complex — worth evaluating before committing if this is central to your use case