| Feature | Lindy AI | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Free Plan | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Pricing | Free / $49/mo | Free / $9–$29/mo |
| Rating | ★★★★★ 4.6 | ★★★★★ 4.6 |
| Key Feature 1 | No-code agent builder | Visual workflow builder |
| Key Feature 2 | Email triage and | 1,500+ app connectors |
| Key Feature 3 | Meeting intelligence | Error handling |
Reach buyers comparing Lindy AI and Make. High-intent traffic, direct conversions.
Lindy AI and Make are rated almost identically by users (4.6 vs 4.6), so the right pick comes down to feature fit rather than overall quality. Both Lindy AI and Make offer free plans, so you can test both before committing. Lindy AI tends to be favoured by marketers, while Make is more popular with programmers and remote-work.
Lindy AI and Make are frequently weighed against each other — both sit in the productivity tools space, but they solve the problem from different angles. Lindy AI is best known for no-code agent builder, whereas Make stands out for visual workflow builder. Both land at 4.6/5 with users, so the right pick comes down to fit rather than raw quality.
Where Lindy AI pulls clearly ahead is building an AI agent to manage and prioritise your email inbox. A frequent plus in reviews: No code required to build agents. Make, by contrast, is the stronger choice for building complex multi-branch automation with conditional logic. In its favour: More powerful than Zapier — especially for visual workflow builder workflows where Make consistently outperforms manual approaches. Picking based on which of those jobs you actually do day to day beats chasing a longer feature list.
Lindy AI is the most accessible personal AI agent builder — the no-code interface and pre-built agent templates make it faster to deploy than Relevance AI or custom LangChain implementations. Make is the right automation tool for anyone who has hit Zapier's complexity ceiling. If you only have budget or appetite for one, match the tool to your heaviest workflow rather than the spec sheet.
Choose Lindy AI if you are focused on executives, business owners, and operations professionals who want AI agents to handle repetitive business tasks — email management, meeting scheduling, research, and document creation — without engineering support, or if a big part of your week goes to creating an agent that researches prospects and summarises findings before calls. Its free tier also lets you validate the fit before paying.
Choose Make if your priority is technical users, developers, and operations teams who need complex automation with branching logic, data transformation, and multi-step processes — and who find Zapier too simple, especially for transforming and mapping data between apps with custom formulas. A free plan is available, so you can trial the workflow at zero cost first.
In day-to-day use, Lindy AI feels strongest at building an AI agent to manage and prioritise your email inbox, while Make is more at home with building complex multi-branch automation with conditional logic.
Learning curve is worth weighing. Lindy AI has a known trade-off — Free / $49/mo puts it out of reach for individual users and very small teams on tight budgets. On Make's side: Steeper learning curve — worth evaluating before committing if this is central to your use case. Whichever one slots into your current stack with the least friction tends to win in the long run.
Both tools offer a free plan, so you can trial each side by side before spending anything. Paid plans start at $49.99/mo for Lindy AI (Pro) and $9/mo for Make (Core), making Make the cheaper entry point at $9/mo versus $49.99/mo. The extra spend on Lindy AI only pays off if you need what its higher tier unlocks. Watch for usage caps and per-seat costs at the tier you'll really land on, not the headline price.
🚀 Ready to decide? Try both free and see which fits your workflow.
Lindy AI is a no-code AI agent builder for creating personal and business automation agents — Lindy can manage your inbox, schedule meetings… Read the full Lindy AI review →
Make (formerly Integromat) is a visual automation platform connecting 1,800+ apps through a drag-and-drop scenario builder. Unlike Zapier's … Read the full Make review →
• No code required to build agents
• Proactive — acts without being prompted
• Great for email and calendar automation
• Multi-agent delegation is powerful — especially for no-code agent builder workflows where Lindy AI consistently outperforms manual approaches
• Free / $49/mo puts it out of reach for individual users and very small teams on tight budgets
• Agents need tuning to avoid over-automation
• More powerful than Zapier — especially for visual workflow builder workflows where Make consistently outperforms manual approaches
• Practical free tier that lets you validate the tool before committing to paid plans
• Highly customizable and flexible, allowing users to create complex automations tailored to their specific needs
• Cost-effective for high-volume automations, with a pricing model based on operations rather than tasks
• Steeper learning curve — worth evaluating before committing if this is central to your use case
• UI can be complex — worth evaluating before committing if this is central to your use case