| Feature | Make | OpenHands |
|---|---|---|
| Free Plan | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Pricing | Free / $9–$29/mo | Free (open-source) / Cloud $25/mo |
| Rating | ★★★★★ 4.6 | ★★★★★ 4.5 |
| Key Feature 1 | Visual workflow builder | Model-agnostic agent runtime |
| Key Feature 2 | 1,500+ app connectors | Full Linux sandbox |
| Key Feature 3 | Error handling | Web browsing |
Reach buyers comparing Make and OpenHands. High-intent traffic, direct conversions.
Make and OpenHands are rated almost identically by users (4.6 vs 4.5), so the right pick comes down to feature fit rather than overall quality. Both Make and OpenHands offer free plans, so you can test both before committing. Make tends to be favoured by agencies and freelancers, while OpenHands is more popular with researchers and enterprises.
Make and OpenHands are frequently weighed against each other — Make is built around productivity tools while OpenHands leans toward coding tools. Make is best known for visual workflow builder, whereas OpenHands stands out for model-agnostic agent runtime. On aggregate user ratings Make holds a slight edge (4.6/5 vs 4.5/5), though that gap rarely decides the match on its own.
Where Make pulls clearly ahead is building complex multi-branch automation with conditional logic. A frequent plus in reviews: More powerful than Zapier — especially for visual workflow builder workflows where Make consistently outperforms manual approaches. OpenHands, by contrast, is the stronger choice for running autonomous code generation tasks using Claude or GPT-4o via API. In its favour: Fully open-source and self-hostable — especially for model-agnostic agent runtime workflows where OpenHands consistently outperforms manual approaches. Trying to force either tool outside its lane is where teams usually get frustrated.
Make is the right automation tool for anyone who has hit Zapier's complexity ceiling. OpenHands is the best open-source alternative to Devin — comparable core capabilities without the commercial subscription cost. Bottom line: the "better" tool here is the one that fits the work you do most.
Choose Make if you are focused on technical users, developers, and operations teams who need complex automation with branching logic, data transformation, and multi-step processes — and who find Zapier too simple, or if a big part of your week goes to transforming and mapping data between apps with custom formulas. Its free tier also lets you validate the fit before paying.
Choose OpenHands if your priority is developers and researchers wanting to experiment with autonomous coding agents without a $500/mo subscription — using open-source infrastructure with any AI model through their own API keys, especially for testing the capabilities of autonomous software agents on real coding tasks. A free plan is available, so you can trial the workflow at zero cost first.
On reliability and output quality, both are dependable, but Make shines at building complex multi-branch automation with conditional logic and OpenHands at running autonomous code generation tasks using Claude or GPT-4o via API.
Learning curve is worth weighing. Make has a known trade-off — Steeper learning curve — worth evaluating before committing if this is central to your use case. On OpenHands's side: Setup requires Docker knowledge — worth evaluating before committing if this is central to your use case. Budget a week or two to get fluent in either before judging the output.
Both tools offer a free plan, so you can trial each side by side before spending anything. Make is priced Free / $9–$29/mo and OpenHands Free (open-source) / Cloud $25/mo; map the tier you'd actually buy against your real usage before committing. The sticker price rarely tells the whole story — check seat counts and usage limits before you commit.
🚀 Ready to decide? Try both free and see which fits your workflow.
Make (formerly Integromat) is a visual automation platform connecting 1,800+ apps through a drag-and-drop scenario builder. Unlike Zapier's … Read the full Make review →
OpenHands (formerly OpenDevin) is an open-source autonomous software engineering agent that can write code, execute terminal commands, brows… Read the full OpenHands review →
• More powerful than Zapier — especially for visual workflow builder workflows where Make consistently outperforms manual approaches
• Practical free tier that lets you validate the tool before committing to paid plans
• Highly customizable and flexible, allowing users to create complex automations tailored to their specific needs
• Cost-effective for high-volume automations, with a pricing model based on operations rather than tasks
• Steeper learning curve — worth evaluating before committing if this is central to your use case
• UI can be complex — worth evaluating before committing if this is central to your use case
• Fully open-source and self-hostable — especially for model-agnostic agent runtime workflows where OpenHands consistently outperforms manual approaches
• Model-agnostic — works with any LLM
• Strong privacy with local deployment
• Most popular open alternative to Devin
• Setup requires Docker knowledge — worth evaluating before committing if this is central to your use case
• Cloud version is newer and less stable