Make

ai-productivity-tools
make.com
★★★★★ 4.6 / 5
VS
🤖

Skyvern

ai-agents
skyvern.com
★★★★☆ 4.3 / 5
⚔️ Head-to-Head Comparison · Updated June 2026

Make vs Skyvern — Which is Better in 2026?

By AsmiAI Editorial Team · Last updated June 2026

Quick Verdict: Make edges ahead with a 4.6/5 rating vs Skyvern's 4.3/5. Both tools serve similar use cases — the best choice depends on your specific workflow, budget, and feature priorities. Read our full comparison below.

Quick Comparison Table

FeatureMakeSkyvern
Free Plan✓ Yes✓ Yes
PricingFree / $9–$29/moFree / $0.10 per task
Rating★★★★★ 4.6★★★★☆ 4.3
Key Feature 1Visual workflow builderVision-based navigation
Key Feature 21,500+ app connectorsNatural language tasks
Key Feature 3Error handlingForm filling
Sponsored

📣 Advertise on This Page

Reach buyers comparing Make and Skyvern. High-intent traffic, direct conversions.

About Make

Make (formerly Integromat) is a visual workflow automation platform that connects 1,500+ apps using a drag-and-drop scenario builder with powerful branching logic, data transformation, and error handl

About Skyvern

Skyvern is an open-source AI agent that automates browser-based workflows using computer vision and reasoning instead of brittle CSS selectors or XPath scripts — meaning it doesn't break when websites

Performance Comparison

Make Scores

Ease of Use93%
Features90%
Value for Money86%

Skyvern Scores

Ease of Use82%
Features79%
Value for Money86%

Pros & Cons

✅ Make Pros

• More powerful than Zapier — especially for visual workflow builder workflows where Make consistently outperforms manual approaches

• Practical free tier that lets you validate the tool before committing to paid plans

❌ Cons

• Steeper learning curve — worth evaluating before committing if this is central to your use case

• UI can be complex — worth evaluating before committing if this is central to your use case

✅ Skyvern Pros

• Doesn't break when websites update layouts

• Natural language task descriptions — especially for vision-based navigation workflows where Skyvern consistently outperforms manual approaches

• Open-source codebase — self-host for full data control, audit the code, or contribute to the community

• Handles complex multi-step web workflows

❌ Cons

• Slower than scripted RPA on stable sites — can be a bottleneck during high-traffic periods or when processing large batches

• Computer vision adds latency per page

🏆 Final Verdict — When to Use Each

Use Make ifYou need visual workflow builder and prefer Free / $9–$29/mo pricing.
Use Skyvern ifYou need vision-based navigation and the Free / $0.10 per task plan fits your budget.
Overall WinnerMake edges ahead with a 4.6/5 rating, broader feature set, and strong user satisfaction scores.